![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj79SwBvuoY0dRAsRvYJQdD4TdRtmltOLKAPwhspJFBbV7Lif8ua8cNdAxDcR4QUxwvN6S0PU5XjgWwNKPTHWX-gRtjHGFD8BR5IzuwdQYOun_2uonLFb329Cc_khDHOAd4GkafELCdyky9/s320/SecondLook-3-3.jpg)
This certainly violates my rule: included photos are less than 2 days old before upload.
However, even though these were shot over 10 years ago, the digital files are only 2 days old. When I traveled to East Africa in 2000 I was using a APS SLR (I think I bought one of only a dozen or so ever sold). By APS I mean APS film, that attempt by Kodak and Fuji to bridge the gab between film and the coming digital revolution. Some readers will recognize APS-C as a sensor size in todays mid-sized digital cameras... the APS designation was taken from the film format.
For a long time I considered getting some of the APS negatives professionally scanned and a Groupon for ScanCafe was what got me to actually get it done. I had doubts that the quality would be very good by todays standards, and actually most of the photos in retrospect were pretty much of the snap-shot variety, but there were a few images that had possibilities.
The photos suffered from high contrast and most days in Africa did not offer very good light (perhaps the time of year or the fact that most of our drives were in the middle of the day). It also reminds me of the great benefits of digital... the ability to take lots of pictures and not worry about film and processing costs, the better dynamic range (at least when compared to APS), the lack of film grain (but with digital you have noise which seems easier to deal with these days)m the ease and extensive options for editing.
By the way, if you are interested in seeing more of the shots from my Africa trip
click here.